How this guide publishes

Editorial Policy

Quick answer: every factual game claim must stay within the scope of a named public source or reproducible test. Recommendations must show their goal and assumptions. Unknowns remain visible, conflicts remain unresolved until new evidence settles them, and dates change only when the page actually changes.

Answer firstSource-bound claimsIndependent fan guide
Researched by
IMGG Research Editor
Gameplay evidence
Public recording review — no first-person gameplay tester assigned
Published
Last updated
Last gameplay check
Evidence
Official · video-confirmed · calculator-derived
Reader-first structure

How core pages are organized

  1. 01

    Answer the task

    State the useful current answer and recommended action in ordinary player language.

  2. 02

    Show the steps or data

    Provide the table, calculator, checklist, or decision sequence needed to act.

  3. 03

    Explain the reasoning

    Tie the recommendation to its goal, inputs, and exceptions.

  4. 04

    Expose evidence and limits

    Name source type, checked date, conflicts, account-state boundaries, and missing facts.

  5. 05

    Record changes

    Publish the real revision and correction trail without artificial date refreshes.

Non-negotiable rules

What may and may not be published

Required

  • Exact Roblox game identity
  • Public source and checked date
  • Visible status for conflicts and unknowns
  • Transparent calculation inputs
  • Human review before public data changes
  • Original explanation and task value

Prohibited

  • Invented codes, rewards, characters, or formulas
  • Copied competitor or video text
  • Old mobile Idle Mafia data mixed into Roblox
  • Fake personal testing or contributor identity
  • Scripts, exploits, autofarm, or cheat downloads
  • Daily date changes without content changes
Independence and tools

Commercial and AI boundaries

This site is not operated by Roblox, Stacks of Cash, or Smoothbrain. Advertising and affiliate relationships do not change a code status, ranking, source label, or correction decision.

Software and AI tools may help organize sources, calculate deterministic outputs, check links, or draft code. The research editor remains responsible for source selection, claim scope, final wording, verification, and publication. Generated text is not evidence.

Conflicting sources

Disagreement stays visible

Community-reported When current sources disagree, the page shows both the strongest success evidence and the conflicting current report. It does not pick the more convenient claim or mark it Active without recent first-person reproduction.

Update history

What was rechecked

  1. Published sourcing, structure, independence, AI-assistance, and prohibited-content rules.Site-wide editorial standard